Chaiyaporn Yuksen1, Phatthranit Phattharapornjaroen1, Woranee Kreethep1, Chonnakarn Suwanmano1, Chestsadakon Jenpanitpong1, Rawin Nonnongku1, Yuwares Sittichanbuncha1, Kittisak Sawanyawisuth2

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sleep Apnea Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Keywords: Adrenaline, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, outcomes


OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine additional predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation success using a national emergency medical services (EMS) database.

METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted by retrieving data from the Information Technology of Emergency Medical Service, a national EMS database. The inclusion criteria were adult patients (18 years old or over) who suffered from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and received emergency life support. The outcome was a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Predictors for ROSC were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: During the study period, 1070 patients met the study criteria, among whom 199 (18.60%) belonged to the ROSC group. Five factors were eligible for multivariate logistic regression analysis for predicting ROSC. Accordingly, only adrenaline administration was independently and negatively associated with ROSC with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.722 (95% confidence interval: 0.522, 0.997) and a Hosmer–Lemeshow Chi-square of 5.84 (P = 0.665).

CONCLUSIONS: Adrenaline use may be a poor predictor for ROSC during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

How to cite this article: Yuksen C, Phattharapornjaroen P, Kreethep W, Suwanmano C, Jenpanitpong C, Nonnongku R, Sittichanbuncha Y, Sawanyawisuth K. Adrenaline use as a poor predictor for the return of spontaneous circulation among victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to a national emergency medical services database. Turk J Emerg Med 2020;20:18-21

Author Contributions

1. Conceived and designed the experiments: CY, YS, KS. 2. Performed the experiments: CY, PP, WK, CS, CJ, RN, YS. 3. Analyzed and interpreted the data: CY, KS. 4. Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data: CY. 5. Wrote the pape: CY, KS

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financial Disclosure